WE NEED CHANGE…read as “the Democrats need a one party rule”***UPDATE***

October 29, 2008

I guess it won’t be that hard to reach across the aisle after all.  Pelosi and Reid have announced that a one party rule of the White House and Congress will create bipartisanship.  Republicans do not agree.  Although I think the mid-term election of 2006 was on the shoulders of the GOP and the war in Iraq (at that time), I cannot understand how a one party rule will create a bipartisan utopia on Capitol Hill.

Now comes Senator Schumer, to explain to us how and why a one party rule will actually help this country in a time of Change

From National Journal/CongressDaily

[Republicans] can’t win on domestic policy; they can’t win on foreign policy; they can’t win on sort of trying to tag our candidates; so the latest theme is, ‘Oh, let’s have some balance in government. Let’s have divided government,’ ” Schumer said at a press briefing. “Our view is very simple, and that is Republican senators, Republican incumbents aren’t for checks and balances. They’re for blocking change and backing [President] Bush.”

OK, Senator Schumer, using your logic you and the Democrats are not for change of this country but to push and back Obama’s socilaist platform.  Or Democrats were only for blocking numerous bills and judicial nominees during the last 8 years.  Remember the filabuster and the Nuclear option?  Ring any bells?

The legislative process was created for political debate.  The way you imagine democracy is not a democracy at all.  That would be called a Monarchy…at best.  The king Obama, who rules with out disagreeance, the Lords, the Legislature, who only look at the best interest of the King and who are unopposed by any other being.  The future of any entity thrives on debate.  It is only through debate where innovation can take life.  POLITICAL DEBATE is what makes this country great.  It is the basis for “Free Speech” in the First Amendment. 

It is through debate that helped form my political views. At my High School the Republicans/conservatives were mocked.  In Government class my senior year, we completed a questionnaire which would tell us where stood politically.  I purposely answered so I would be deemed a moderate, just because I did not want to be a democrat or republican.  It was not until later, in my college classes, where debate was unfettered.  I heard things which forced me to research different ideas and ideologies.  It was through this research that I became a conservative.  Not because of my friends or family, but because political debate asked me to question what my core beliefs were.  Without this debate, I would still be a PC moderate, making sure not to piss anyone off.  I am glad for the liberals, socialists, communists, monarchists, and conservatives I met at UNLV (a very liberal school) who sparked my intellect.  It was through political debate which made me who I am today.   It is POLITICAL DEBATE which makes this country great. 

A reader on MM noted that Schumer warned against one party rule just three years ago: (FOX News Sunday, 4/10/05):


 “And again, you can’t just have one-party rule here . . .The point is that there have to be checks and balances here. A check and a balance does not necessarily always mean a majority vote. We have 60 votes before you can do certain kinds of spending increases. The Senate is always supposed to be, Chris, the cooling saucer.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: